0evidence items
0open actions
0due / overdue reviews
0closed items to verify
SEE → DECIDE → ACT → VERIFY
1 · SeeLook at the evidenceRisks, training, contractors, incidents, inspections and actions.
2 · DecideSet the priorityConsider risk, legal duties, change and what the evidence shows.
3 · ActGive it an ownerMake the action and expected outcome clear.
4 · VerifyDid it work?Check significant changes actually improved the control or outcome.
Manager attention list
This reads the Evidence & Action Register saved in this browser.
When should we review controls?
Control is not working effectively
For example, an incident, near miss or monitoring result indicates the control is not managing the risk.
Workplace or work changes
Review before a change likely to create a new or different risk that the existing control may not manage.
A new hazard or risk is identified
Worker engagement indicates a review is needed
Other prescribed review triggers apply
Some work, exposure monitoring and health monitoring requirements have additional triggers. Check the rules relevant to your work.
Improvement questions for managers
What has changed since the control or process was introduced?
What are workers, contractors, incidents, inspections and monitoring telling us?
Are our highest-consequence risks receiving the strongest attention?
Did the assigned action actually remove or reduce the problem?
Do we need to update training, supervision, contractor coordination or evidence?
What should be carried into the next project or site?
NZQC provides practical educational and management tools. This dashboard does not certify legal compliance and does not replace assessment of the requirements applying to your work.