Employer self-check · Construction & Trades

What needs your attention?

Use this first-pass check to identify areas to review in your construction or trades business. Answer based on what is actually in place today, not what is intended.

Important: This tool organises practical checks and links to official sources. It does not certify legal compliance, replace competent professional advice, or mean every item applies to every construction business.
Must = legal requirementShould = WorkSafe/recommended practiceNot applicable = genuinely outside your work
0answered
0need attention
10not checked

1. Risks & controls

Start with the risks created by the work and the controls actually used on site.

Must: Are work health and safety risks being identified, eliminated where reasonably practicable, or otherwise minimised?

Consider the real work, plant, substances, structures and people who may be affected.

Basis: HSWA primary duty and risk-management duties. NZ Legislation ↗

Have you identified which critical or high-consequence construction risks are present in your work?

Examples can include work at height, asbestos, excavations, cranes/lifting, electricity and other critical risks depending on the work.

Basis: WorkSafe critical-risk guidance. WorkSafe ↗

If work at height occurs, are fall risks planned and managed before work starts?

Select Not applicable only if your business genuinely does not undertake work at height.

Basis: WorkSafe working-at-height guidance. WorkSafe ↗

2. People, training & supervision

Training is part of capability; it does not by itself prove competency.

Must: Are workers given suitable information, training, instruction or supervision for their work and its risks?

Training and supervision need to fit the work, risks and control measures, and be readily understandable.

Basis: General Risk and Workplace Management Regulations, regulation 9. NZ Legislation ↗

Must: Are workers engaged on health and safety matters that directly affect them?

Worker participation should provide reasonable opportunities to contribute to improving health and safety.

Basis: HSWA sections 58–61. NZ Legislation ↗

3. Contractors & shared sites

Construction commonly involves overlapping duties between PCBUs.

Must: Where duties overlap, are you consulting, cooperating and coordinating with the other PCBUs?

Roles and controls should be clear enough to avoid gaps or risks being pushed down the contracting chain.

Basis: HSWA overlapping duties and WorkSafe contracting guidance. WorkSafe ↗

4. Site readiness

Check the basics that need to work when something goes wrong as well as during normal work.

Must: Is there an emergency plan appropriate to the workplace and work?

The general risk regulations include duties to prepare, maintain and implement an emergency plan.

Basis: General Risk and Workplace Management Regulations, regulation 14. NZ Legislation ↗

If PPE is used as a control, is suitable PPE provided and managed as required?

PPE duties depend on the circumstances and sit behind higher-order controls in the risk-management process.

Basis: General Risk and Workplace Management Regulations, regulations 15–20. NZ Legislation ↗

Have you checked whether any planned high-risk work must be notified to WorkSafe before it starts?

Some work at height, scaffolding, excavation, crane and other hazardous work has notification requirements.

Basis: WorkSafe notification guidance. WorkSafe ↗

5. Evidence & review

Records should support the system, not become the system.

Can you show useful evidence that key controls, training, coordination and follow-up are actually happening?

Evidence may include risk/control records, inductions, competency or licence records where relevant, contractor arrangements, inspections, incidents and review actions. Keep legally required records for the periods that apply.

Management check: evidence should reflect the duties and controls that apply to your work.

Your review picture

Answer the questions above. We will show the areas that need attention without turning the result into a misleading “compliance percentage”.